Devolving water sharing
arrangements
By
Dr Muhammad Siddique Shafique
MOST of the old civilizations have flourished within famous
river basins. As evident from the old relics of Harappa and
Mohenjo-Daro, the Indus Basin civilization also followed the
same pattern.
However, as the time passed by, other factors such as
language, religion and power games drew new administrative
lines within a hydraulic unit like a river basin. These
lines appeared artificial at the initial stages but they
became realities over time.
For example, Punjab, a land within five main tributaries of
the Indus River, was mainly partitioned based on Muslim and
non-Muslim population in 1947. However, this was also a
partitioning of a river basin and Pakistan is still trying
to manage its consequences. Because all the main
tributaries, except the Kabul River, originate from
territories under Indian control, the vulnerability of major
part of the Indus Basin in Pakistan is a huge threat to
lives forever.
Another fact on ground is that we missed an opportunity to
take up and resolve water related issues. In spite of all
fair and unfair referred happenings, still, trans-boundary
water resources were negotiated and agreed as early as 1960.
However, resolution of water distribution among main
stakeholders like Punjab and Sindh has a long history
starting from the nineteenth century that culminated by
signing the Water Apportionment Accord in 1991.
Our record of settling water disputes is not that enviable.
Even after Water Apportionment Accord of 1991, the country
is still not out of woods and facing many difficulties in
water distribution among four provinces.
Let us take example of an old princely state of Bahawalpur;
its only lifeline is the Sutlej River. After 1947, for all
practical purposes, this has become a dysfunctional river.
Just stand on its bridge near Bahawalpur to witness a river
of sand all the way. Similarly, the Ravi River has become a
dirty drain to carry just effluents of many big cities of
Punjab.
Another ground reality is that most irrigation canals have
their head-works in central Punjab and they irrigate huge
areas of central and southern Punjab except those canals
that are served from barrages like Trimmu, Sidhnai and
Mailsi Siphon on the Indus tributaries and Jinnah, Chashma
and Taunsa on the main Indus.
In order to avoid having Cholistan and Thal type deserts
everywhere in the province in Punjab, experts and
intellectuals must find proactive solutions for such
potentially dangerous outcome.
After division of the Indus Basin, rivers are also divided.
According to the Indus Water Treaty and some defence
compulsions resulted into constructing link canals
connecting functional rivers to dysfunctional rivers of
Punjab. Again because of the laws of nature, except for four
link-canals, all other six such canals are located right in
central Punjab. Since Sindh has serious reservations about
the operations of Chashma-Jhelum Link canal, southern Punjab
will have full control on Tausa-Punjnand link canal only.
If one knows about routine bickering between Sindh and
Balochistan over water delivery from one canal taking off
from Sukker Barrage, what about the extent of dozens of
canals that will generate similar mistrust among the
beneficiaries of central and southern Punjab. Of course, we
can close our eyes for the time being and refuse to address
them, but realities will not change even if they are
ignored.
On the top of all the hydraulic complexities referred above,
are we going to re-open the Pandora-box of water
distribution again? Sure, it is bound to happen.
We can still address grievances of all less developed areas
by going back to devolution at lower levels and following
resource distribution by having financial
commissions/committees at provincial, districts, tehsils and
union councils like we agreed under the National Finance
Commission.
Before it is too late, our decision makers need to read what
is clearly written on the wall. So, the most practical and
hassle-free solution remains to implement a real devolution
of power and moving the provincial capital immediately from
Lahore to either of the following less congested and less
developed cities in southern Punjab like Khaniwal, Vehari,
Muzzafar Garh and Lodhran.
However, if we are bent upon to create new provinces,
hydraulic boundaries must be given serious consideration
along with addressing the concerns of Sindh regarding the
Chasma-Jhelum Link Canal. A hydraulic boundary drawn by
Chasma-Jhelum, Trimmu-Sidnai, Sidhnai-Mailsi and Bahwal
Canal will make southern Punjab a relatively lesser
vulnerable province as far as water resources are concerned.
However, the success of this alternative will also depend on
an amicable settlement of water sharing among all stake
holders and establishment of effective district government
system with an assured financial resource distribution under
a devolution plan at lower levels.
Courtesy: The DAWN