|
Failure to counter rumours about poultry
By Zafar Samdani
A few weeks back, the
federal government had announced the launching of
media campaign to allay the apprehensions of the
public about the consumption of poultry and
poultry products so that the impression that they
are harmful to human health is dispelled.
The decision was taken in the backdrop of outbreak
of Avian Influenza in some far eastern countries,
the US and Mexico and due to a few cases of H-7
and H-9 in Karachi
towards the end of the last year. That had put
many people off poultry products and created a
scare about after-effects of consuming them.
Avian Flu swept a number of countries during the
past few weeks and so far about 22 deaths have
been reported because of the epidemic in poultry.
The countries affected
by the disease destroyed large stocks of poultry
and imports from them were banned almost across
the globe.
Pakistan has however not been an importer and
there seems little reason to think that the
epidemic had spread to the country but reports of
culling of birds and loss of
human life inevitably had an impact on local
consumption of poultry and consequently on the
poultry sector that counts for an official
investment of about Rs. 60 billion and
employs a large number of veterinary specialists
and workers.
The sector is a component of Pakistan's
agriculture that is regarded as the backbone of
the national economy. It would not be wrong to
describe poultry as the backbone of
the farming population.
It is easy for rumours to reach people; they hit
poultry business in Pakistan much harder than the
epidemic. As a result, sale of poultry and its
products came down steeply
and mutton and beef prices registered a quick and
frightening rise.
The public, already suffering from a lack of
proteins in its food, was vastly affected,
particularly children, as eggs are a basic part of
their diet, not that they are available to
every child.
The only way to counter rumours and negative
developments building confidence of the people is
by undertaking a vigorous media campaign but
unfortunately the federal
government did not deliver its promise and
provincial governments, particularly that of Sindh,
that has been the hardest hit by the suspicion of
spread of Asian Flu, also did
not take up the issue.
This is not to exonerate the Poultry Association
of Pakistan of its responsibility, more so as a
campaign was in its own interest. Such
organizations do not lack requisite
resources for protecting their interests and
should be geared for meeting emergencies.
Its office bearers and leaders restricted
themselves to complaining against the government's
apathy towards the plight of their sector instead
of launching their own campaign
to protect the poultry industry.
Some of their grievances were admittedly not
misplaced. The ban imposed on inter-province
movement of poultry substantially undermined
poultry business in the Sindh
province where the bulk of the industry is located
in Hub district that falls under Balochistan and
supplies birds and eggs to hotels in Karachi.
Timely intervention was
indicated but that did not take place.
The government is expected to be more alive to
such issues and is required to take and implement
decisions without loss of time. The declaration of
FAO and WHO
describing Pakistan safe from the epidemic should
have been widely publicized.
The problem has hurt the industry in Punjab too
but comparatively much less in view of the fact
that no case of any kind of Asian influenza was
reported in the province.
However, despite that, the price of poultry came
down considerably and those of mutton and beef
rose. This was surprising as meat requirements are
reduced after Eid Ul
Azha.
The phenomenon is attributed to relatively
scuttled consumption of poultry due to Flu rumors
though 'white meat' has become popular with
consumers as it is recommended
by many physicians for health reasons and in view
of the lower cost of bird meat.
Fortunately, the rumours did not reach rural
Pakistan and people in smaller cities did not
react to reports of the flu in foreign courtiers.
The rural economy would have been
seriously impaired if reports of the flu had
spread to villages where small farmers subsidise
their income by breeding poultry that serves for
food as well.
Strangely, the Pakistan Medical Association has
been more active on this front than organizations
linked with poultry. A number of doctors have
stepped forward to clear the
airs of possible after affects of consuming
poultry products and thus helped the industry from
greater losses.
Some minister also played a useful role by getting
their photographs printed in newspapers that
showed them consuming poultry based food. That had
a positive impact and
one wishes such activities were vastly
disseminated by electronic media, particularly
state sector PTV.
Otherwise, by and large, the governments, both
federal and provincial failed to provide
leadership and protection to the poultry sector at
a time when it badly needed state
support.
The government also failed on another count.
European Union banned pet birds from nine Asian
countries in the aftermath of Avian Influenza.
EU's list included Pakistan
also.
While names of countries hit by the epidemic are
understandable, Pakistan featuring on the list
informs of a lack of interest in the issue by
concerned embassies.
There is no reason why Pakistan should have made
the list of banned countries. This would not have
happened if diplomats posted in EU countries had
made an effort,
particularly as India, another country of the
region, was not placed on the banned list.
The embassies should have convinced governments of
EU members that FOA and WHO have cleared Pakistan
as safe from the epidemic. Pakistan does not have
any
export of pet birds to these countries but such
incidents impair the country's image that could do
with help at any given time and needs support from
every corner at this
point in time.
DAWN
NEWS
|