|
Main Page
|
![]() |
Cotton and textiles — the
challenges ahead
By A. Majeed
FINANCIAL
downturn and chaos in international markets have
severely hit Pakistan, especially the textile industry
which is the biggest provider of jobs and foreign
exchange earner.
Addressing the short-term causes of the industry’s
problems, many specialists have hardly focused on the
challenges the sector is to face in the next decade.
However, most economists agree that the key to quickest
economic recovery is through agriculture and industries
based on its produce.
Cotton is still the most important natural fibre. In the
year 2007, the global yield was 25 million tons from 35
million hectares cultivated in more than 50 countries.
Its importance globally and locally cannot be denied.
Recognising its global significance, Pakistani planners
need to focus on this crop especially because of
introduction of genetically modified cotton seeds. The
growth of cotton is divided into two segments i.e.
organic and genetically modified.
Cotton crop provides livelihood to millions of people
but its production is becoming expensive because of high
water consumption, use of expensive pesticides,
insecticides and fertiliser, most of them imported in
our case. These inputs are injurious to health and a
source polluting the underground water.
Textile products under organic labeling fetch high
prices as compared to genetic cotton products. To obtain
this label, different markets are governed by different
regulation; for example, EU has issued a regulation
2092/9/ and other big markets like US and Japan have
defined their own criteria. The basis of most of the
criteria is renunciation of genetically modified seeds,
synthetic insecticides, pesticides and obligatory manual
picking.
Between 2001-2005, the global sale of organic cotton
products increased by 35 per cent annually, from $338
million to $583 million. The overall global increase in
organic cotton production was around 400 per cent, a
dramatic increase in four years. During the harvest
period 2004-2005, organic cotton was produced in 22
countries, primarily in Turkey 40 per cent, India 25 per
cent, US 7.7 per cent and China 7.3 per cent.
On the other side, in 2007, approximately 20 different
varieties of genetically modified varieties were
cultivated on 43 per cent or 15 million hectares of
global cotton cultivation area. For example, 66 per cent
of Indian cotton, 68 per cent of Chinese and 90 per cent
of US and Argentina’s cotton is genetically modified.
The primary objectives of this modification are:
Resistance against pests; tolerance against herbicides;
adoption to cold, heat, dryness and salt; improved fibre
qualities i.e. fibre length and strength.
The two varieties have their own merits and demerits.
The genetically modified cotton gives better yield,
properties and protects the growth from various pest
attacks. Organic cotton fetches higher price because of
increasing demand and restricted supply. Thus
adulteration of both varieties cannot be ruled out.
So far, organic label only requires documentation and no
analysis but scientific work is under way to detect
adulteration. With scientific tests adulteration can be
stopped or reduced to a large extent. The growers and
industry must choose which variety to patronise.
In case of leaving the choice open, the adulteration of
seeds will occur. Hence the future labeling of our
products will become impossible. This will result in
fetching low prices. The best course will be to
demarcate the areas and ginneries for each variety and
restrict cross boundaries movement of cotton by law with
strict enforcement.
The textile industry must select the areas and work
together with farmers; it is claiming ownership of the
material from field onward. It seems difficult but this
is the only way to control unadulterated cotton. The new
testing methods of fibres, yarns and fabrics are under
way and the present standards will become obsolete
during coming years. Therefore, the growers and industry
must be aware of the coming pitfalls.
In the past sufficient attention had been drawn to
‘environment’ and the focus would be more and more
towards it. The primary concern relates to water and
energy. The future textile industry, like many others,
would have to find solutions to be a qualified supplier
in many export markets. The traditional textile
finishing section is considered to be one of the worst
polluted, because the dyeing and finishing process
repeatedly goes through wet and dry operations.
The consumption of energy in form of water and
electricity is relatively high, especially in processes
like washing, de-sizing, bleaching, rinsing, dyeing,
printing, coating and finishing. Processing is time
consuming. The major portion of water in textile
industry is used for wet processing of textile (70 per
cent). Approximately 25 per cent of energy in the total
textile production like fibre production, spinning,
twisting, weaving, knitting, clothing manufacturing etc.
is used in dyeing. About 34 per cent of energy is
consumed in spinning, 23 per cent in weaving, 38 per
cent in chemical wet processing and five per cent in
miscellaneous processes. Power dominates consumption
pattern in spinning and weaving, while thermal energy is
the major factor for chemical wet processing.
Wet processing in the future should be cost effective,
environment-friendly and gentle to the textile material.
Almost half of the world’s requirements for textile
fibres are met by cotton. Natural fibres such as cotton
are often preferred and also thought better for the
environment. But a large quantity of articles show that
cotton is the most polluting product. This is not only
due to the use of pesticides, approx. 150 million
kg/year, but also to large consumption of water. To
produce one kilo of cotton up to 20,000 1itres of water
is needed, apart from chemicals and energy. The entire
wet process on cotton consumes 150/1kg and when printed
180/1kg. On polyester, 68/1kg will be consumed and when
printed 99/1kg. The high water consumption on cotton is
caused principally through the pre-treatment.
There is an increasing demand for sustainable textile
solutions. Regulatory standards are becoming
increasingly strict. Public awareness is increasing and
consumers are becoming more ecologically conscious.
Water is becoming a scarce resource in relation to
demand, and supply and effluent costs have risen. The
fabrics of the future will be entirely re-conceptualised.
There will be materials with built in digital devices,
capable of repairing themselves when damaged, smart
textiles with nano-materials etc.
However traditional or innovative or added value in
terms of functionality will not always reduce the
consumption of energy and/or water. The processes have
to be analysed where water can be deposited in the form
of a spray with micro, nano or pico drops of liquid and
so be able to control the deposit of liquid needed on
textile to obtain the desired colour and functionality.
Normally, the textile industry is considered a
traditional sector. However, the market is now growing
rapidly with innovative textiles and many developments
of new products and applications are on the market. The
trend is high-tech, high performance fabrics with added
value in terms of functionality.
Technical textiles account for more than 25 per cent of
all fibres consumed and almost 50 per cent of the total
textile activity in certain industrialised countries.
Technical textiles are used individually or as a
part/component of other products. Based on the end-use
applications, these textiles are classified into 12
segments such as: Agrotech - agriculture, horticulture
and forestry; buildtech - building and construction;
clothech - technical components of clothing, shoes;
geotech - geo-textiles, civil engineering; hometech -
household textiles and floor coverings; iIndutech -
filtration, cleaning, other industrial usages; meditech
- hygiene and medical; mobitech - automobiles,
aerospace; oekotech - environmental protection; packtech
– packaging; protech - personal and property protection;
sport-tech - sports and leisure.
In the end, it is needless to stress upon the existing
and coming opportunities. All it needs is a clear policy
direction from the planners and its implementation.
The writer is director of the Textile Research and
Innovation Centre.
Courtesy: The DAWN |
|
Pakissan.com;
|
|
|